Studies Show Increase in Ransomware Targeting Critical Infrastructure During Holiday Season

Image Source: Semperis

Ransomware attacks pose a significant threat year-round; however, they increase significantly during the busy holiday season. Cybercriminals often prepare to launch disruptive cyberattacks targeting multiple sectors, hiding in networks and waiting for the perfect moment to inflict maximum damage and compromise data without detection. A recent study revealed that 86 percent of surveyed organizations that fell victim to ransomware attacks across the United States, United Kingdom, France, and Germany were specifically targeted during holidays or weekends.

Additionally, threat actors consistently target critical infrastructure using advanced tactics to exploit critical operational IT systems. Campaigns notably prioritized industries and organizations with limited downtime, such as healthcare, financial services, and industrial operations. By focusing on environments where operational disruption can lead to cascading impacts, threat actors increase the likelihood of ransom payout, leveraging the criticality of uninterrupted services to pressure victims. 

For example, a ransomware incident recently impacted Rhode Island’s RIBridges, a government system that manages many of the state’s social services programs. Hundreds of thousands of residents’ personal information—such as names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and banking details—was likely compromised.

Brain Cipher ransom note. Image Source: WatchGuard

The ransomware group Brain Cipher is believed to have launched the attack on or before December 5. Brain Cipher is a ransomware operation that utilizes the leaked LockBit 3.0 (Black) builder for its encryptor. The group first became known after extorting the Indonesian government in mid-June 2024 and demanded an $8 million ransom.

Recent reports highlighted significant deficiencies in the state’s cybersecurity measures that required urgent attention, including insufficient resources to manage operations’ complexity and slow progress in risk mitigation. It also stressed the need to improve response capabilities for data breaches and mentioned a lack of specific insurance coverage for cybersecurity risks.

Furthermore, on November 21, the supply chain management firm Blue Yonder reported significant disruptions to its services due to a ransomware attack, specifically impacting grocery store chains in the UK. The managed services environment includes the Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms and cloud-hosted solutions for supply chain operations. Blue Yonder, a subsidiary of Panasonic and an Arizona-based cloud services provider that serves grocery stores, Fortune 500 firms, and a range of multinational corporations, generates over $1 billion in annual revenue. The company provides AI-driven supply chain solutions to prominent clients, including DHL, Starbucks, Walgreens, Kroger, Ford, and Tesco. This attack was likely calculated to coincide with the Thanksgiving holiday and disruptions in the supply chain could have left many grocery stores with empty shelves.

The Termite ransomware group claimed responsibility for this attack. They assert that they have stolen 680GB of data, which includes over 16,000 email lists intended for future attacks and more than 200,000 insurance documents. The group has claimed 10 victims worldwide, primarily focusing on Europe and North America. Targeted sectors include government agencies, education, disability support services, oil and gas, water treatment, and automotive manufacturing.

Ransomware Incidents by Sector: Q2 vs. Q3 2024. Image Source: Dragos

According to Dragos’ 2024 Third Quarter (Q3) Industrial Ransomware Analysis report, analysts observed the emergence of several new and established ransomware groups impacting industrial organizations. Several recent vulnerabilities were identified as initial access vectors used by threat actors targeting government and critical infrastructure sectors. Additionally, vulnerable remote and virtual private network (VPN) applications were exploited for initial access and post-compromise. 

Image Source: Corvus Insurance

Approximately 30 percent of ransomware incidents during the third quarter were linked to vulnerabilities in VPN appliances, such as CVE-2024-40766, which impacts SonicWall SSL VPNs, or poorly managed credentials.  Ransomware groups have also combined vulnerability exploitation with credential-based attacks to bypass multi-factor authentication (MFA) protections. They employ credential stuffing, pass-the-hash attacks, and brute force techniques. Compromised credentials, often sourced from Initial Access Brokers (IABs), have become central to their tactics. In 2023, cybercriminals extorted a record $1.1 billion in ransom payments from organizations worldwide despite the US government’s efforts to disrupt their financial operations.

New Jersey law requires state and local government agencies, public education institutions, and government contractors to report any cyber incidents within 72 hours. This legislation applies to a wide range of entities, including public K-12 schools, public higher education institutions, state law enforcement agencies, counties, municipalities, and more.

Recommendations

  • Refrain from clicking links, responding to, or acting on unsolicited emails.
  • Navigate directly to legitimate websites and verify before submitting account credentials or providing personal or financial information.
  • Use strong, unique passwords for all accounts and enable MFA where available, choosing authentication apps or hardware tokens over SMS text-based codes.
  • Keep systems up to date and apply patches after appropriate testing.
  • Maintain robust and up-to-date endpoint detection tools on every endpoint.
  • Consider leveraging behavior-based detection tools rather than signature-based tools.
  • Utilize network segmentation to isolate valuable assets and help prevent the spread of ransomware and malware.

FlowerStorm’s Phishing Platform Slow Rise to Power

Image Source: Sophos
After the quick rise and fall of the Rockstar2FA Phishing-as-a-Service (PhaaS) platform, a new phishing platform, dubbed FlowerStorm, was observed filling in the gap left behind in Rockstar’s absence. Rockstar2FA platform had a simple interface that utilized adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) techniques to allow threat actors to attempt to bypass the two-factor authentication (2FA) of Microsoft 365 accounts by stealing session cookies during a user’s login session. These stolen session cookies allowed threat actors to access user accounts without needing the user’s credentials or codes.
While the two platforms have not definitively been connected, researchers have found enough similarities between the two that suggest a common ancestry. First seen in June 2024, FlowerStorm shares many similar traits as Rockstar2FA, including:
Platforms utilize phishing portals that mimic legitimate login pages. The HTML structure of their phishing pages is highly similar. While the theming had notable differences (automotive vs. botanical), the underlying design structure remained consistent. Credential harvesting methods align closely and support email validation and MFA authentication through their backend. Platforms utilize similar domain registration and hosting habits, mainly using .ru and .com top-level domains and Cloudflare services. At its peak, Rockstar2FA managed over 2,000 domains. After Rockstar2FA’s collapse, FlowerStorm saw rapid growth, which suggests a shared framework.
Recommendations
Avoid clicking links and opening attachments in unsolicited emails. Confirm requests from senders via contact information obtained from verified and official sources. Type official website URLs into browsers manually.
Facilitate user awareness training to include these types of phishing-based techniques.
Maintain robust and up-to-date endpoint detection tools on every endpoint.
Consider leveraging behavior-based detection tools rather than signature-based tools.

Account Activity Credential Phishing Schemes

Authentic notifications from financial institutions via email and text messaging can help inform users of account activity, such as balances and transactions. However, if a user has consented to receive such notifications, it may be challenging to determine if a notification is legitimate, as threat actors continue to develop persuasive messages purportedly from trustworthy sources that claim to involve credit card or bank account activity. Threat actors create a sense of urgency and panic and may imply that the account security is at risk. They encourage their target to take immediate action, such as divulging information or clicking on a link to a website that looks identical to the legitimate login page.
The NJCCIC’s email security solution identified a credential phishing scheme impersonating Capital One. Although Capital One is referenced in the sender’s display name and username, it is not part of the sender’s domain name, which is a red flag. The messages include a subject line, “Do you recognize this transaction?”, display a fraudulent or unauthorized charge, and contain links that, if clicked, direct targets to a website spoofing the CapitalOne portal to harvest account credentials.
Additionally, it prompts the target to enter their SMS code as part of the SMS phone verification to add a sense of legitimacy. There is also a notation that the code might be slightly delayed due to the target’s mobile network. If entered, the account credentials and SMS code are sent to the threat actors in the background to commit further malicious activity.
Furthermore, the New York State Police recently issued a public warning about increased scams targeting bank account holders. Threat actors convince their targets that they have unauthorized charges or that money was accidentally deposited into their bank account. Financial institutions will never request personal or confidential information, such as account credentials, via notifications or ask to click on a link to verify one’s identity or gain access to the computer.
Recommendations
Refrain from responding to unsolicited communications, clicking links, or opening attachments from unknown senders.
Exercise caution with communications from known senders.
Confirm requests from senders via contact information obtained from verified and official sources.
Type official website URLs into browsers manually and only submit account credentials on official websites.
Use strong, unique passwords for all accounts and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) where available, choosing authentication apps or hardware tokens over SMS text-based codes.
If the account has been compromised, log out of all devices, revoke any access tokens, and reset passwords. Report suspicious or fraudulent communications to the financial institution.

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Sophos Firewall Could Allow for Remote Code Execution – PATCH NOW

OVERVIEW:
Multiple Vulnerabilities have been discovered in Sophos Firewall, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution. Sophos Firewall is a network security solution. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for unauthorized access on the system. Depending on the privileges associated with the system, an attacker could then; view, change, or delete data.

THREAT INTELLEGENCE:
There are currently no reports of the vulnerabilities being exploited.

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • Sophos Firewall v21.0 GA (21.0.0) and older

RISK:
Government:

  • Large and medium government entities: High
  • Small government entities: Medium 

Businesses:

  • Large and medium business entities: High
  • Small business entities: Medium 

Home users: Low 

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Sophos Firewall, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution. Details of the vulnerabilities are as follows: 

TacticInitial Access (TA0001):

Technique: Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190):

  •  A pre-auth SQL injection vulnerability in the email protection feature of Sophos Firewall could lead to remote code execution (CVE-2024-12727).
  • A post-auth code injection vulnerability in the User Portal allows authenticated users to gain remote code execution (CVE-2024-12729).

Additional lower severity vulnerabilities include:

  • The SSH login passphrase for High Availability (HA) cluster initialization remained active after the HA establishment process completed, potentially exposing a privileged system account on the Sophos Firewall (CVE-2024-12728).

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for unauthorized access on the system. Depending on the privileges associated with the system, an attacker could then; view, change, or delete data. 

RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend the following actions be taken:

  • Apply appropriate updates provided by Sophos to vulnerable systems immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
    • Safeguard 7.1 : Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
    • Safeguard 7.2: Establish and Maintain a Remediation Process: Establish and maintain a risk-based remediation strategy documented in a remediation process, with monthly, or more frequent, reviews.
    • Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
    • Safeguard 7.5 : Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of internal enterprise assets on a quarterly, or more frequent, basis. Conduct both authenticated and unauthenticated scans, using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool.
    • Safeguard 7.7: Remediate Detected Vulnerabilities: Remediate detected vulnerabilities in software through processes and tooling on a monthly, or more frequent, basis, based on the remediation process.
    • Safeguard 12.1: Ensure Network Infrastructure is Up-to-Date: Ensure network infrastructure is kept up-to-date. Example implementations include running the latest stable release of software and/or using currently supported network-as-a-service (NaaS) offerings. Review software versions monthly, or more frequently, to verify software support.
    • Safeguard 18.1: Establish and Maintain a Penetration Testing Program: Establish and maintain a penetration testing program appropriate to the size, complexity, and maturity of the enterprise. Penetration testing program characteristics include scope, such as network, web application, Application Programming Interface (API), hosted services, and physical premise controls; frequency; limitations, such as acceptable hours, and excluded attack types; point of contact information; remediation, such as how findings will be routed internally; and retrospective requirements.
    • Safeguard 18.2: Perform Periodic External Penetration Tests: Perform periodic external penetration tests based on program requirements, no less than annually. External penetration testing must include enterprise and environmental reconnaissance to detect exploitable information. Penetration testing requires specialized skills and experience and must be conducted through a qualified party. The testing may be clear box or opaque box.
    • Safeguard 18.3: Remediate Penetration Test Findings: Remediate penetration test findings based on the enterprise’s policy for remediation scope and prioritization.
       
  • Apply the Principle of Least Privilege to all systems and services. Run all software as a non-privileged user (one without administrative privileges) to diminish the effects of a successful attack. (M1026: Privileged Account Management)
    • Safeguard 4.7: Manage Default Accounts on Enterprise Assets and Software: Manage default accounts on enterprise assets and software, such as root, administrator, and other pre-configured vendor accounts. Example implementations can include: disabling default accounts or making them unusable.
    • Safeguard 5.5: Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Service Accounts: Establish and maintain an inventory of service accounts. The inventory, at a minimum, must contain department owner, review date, and purpose. Perform service account reviews to validate that all active accounts are authorized, on a recurring schedule at a minimum quarterly, or more frequently.
       
  • Vulnerability scanning is used to find potentially exploitable software vulnerabilities to remediate them. (M1016: Vulnerability Scanning)
    • Safeguard 16.13: Conduct Application Penetration Testing: Conduct application penetration testing. For critical applications, authenticated penetration testing is better suited to finding business logic vulnerabilities than code scanning and automated security testing. Penetration testing relies on the skill of the tester to manually manipulate an application as an authenticated and unauthenticated user.
       
  • Architect sections of the network to isolate critical systems, functions, or resources. Use physical and logical segmentation to prevent access to potentially sensitive systems and information. Use a DMZ to contain any internet-facing services that should not be exposed from the internal network. Configure separate virtual private cloud (VPC) instances to isolate critical cloud systems. (M1030: Network Segmentation)
    • Safeguard 12.2: Establish and Maintain a Secure Network Architecture: Establish and maintain a secure network architecture. A secure network architecture must address segmentation, least privilege, and availability, at a minimum.
       
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
    • Safeguard 10.5:  Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Microsoft® Data Execution Prevention (DEP), Windows® Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG), or Apple® System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.
       

REFERENCES:

Sophos:
https://www.sophos.com/en-us/security-advisories/sophos-sa-20241219-sfos-rce

CVE:
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-12727
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-12728
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-12729

NIST Privacy Enhancing Cryptography (PEC), Special Topics on Privacy and Public Auditability, Event #7 (Virtual), January 16, 2025

A main goal of the STPPA series is to gather reference material about “PEC tools”, which may facilitate future reflections on the characterization and development of recommendations/guidelines about advanced cryptography, namely for uses related to privacy and public auditability. Each event will include talks on various interconnected topics, aiming to convey basic technical background, incite curiosity, suggest research questions and discuss applications, with an emphasis on the role of cryptographic tools. Attendance in each event is open and free to the public, but requires registration.

Read More & Register

REGISTER | NIST NCCoE Cybersecurity Connections Event & Networking Lunch

Event Date: Thursday, January 23, 2025

Event Time: 11:00 a.m. – 1:30 p.m. (EST)

Event Location: National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence, 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville, MD 20850

Description:

Join us for an in-person ‘Cybersecurity Connections’ Event and Networking Lunch! Hosted in partnership with the Maryland Department of Commerce and Montgomery County, these quarterly events feature a discussion on cybersecurity best practices from leaders in the community, as well as a networking lunch, sponsored by the Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation on behalf of Montgomery County, Maryland.

The NCCoE is currently working with 24 technology vendors to demonstrate the application of technologies and standards to deploy end-to-end zero trust architectures consistent with NIST SP 800-207, Zero Trust Architecture. The event’s expert panel will discuss this work, along with lessons learned for deploying a zero trust architecture, aiming to address both small and large business perspectives during this event.

Agenda:

11:00 – 11:30 a.m. – Arrival/Event Check-In

11:30 – 11:40 a.m. – Welcome and Opening Remarks

Speaker: Honorable Marc Elrich, County Executive, Montgomery County, Maryland

Speaker: Kimberly Mentzell, Director of Cybersecurity and Aerospace, Maryland Department of Commerce

11:40 – 11:45 a.m. – Introduction to the National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE)

Speaker: Cherilyn Pascoe, Director, NCCoE (NIST)

11:45 a.m. – 12:45 p.m. – Panel Discussion: Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture

Moderator: Alper Kerman, Principal Lead Zero Trust Security Engineer, Project Manager, NCCoE (NIST)

Panelists:

– Dr. Chase Cunningham, Host, Dr. ZeroTrust Podcast

– Chris Jensen, Federal Business Development and Capture Manager, Tenable

– Dr. Haydar Teymourlouei, Associate Professor, Dept. of Technology & Security, Bowie State University

– Faisal Quader, President & Co-Founder, Technuf, LLC

– Kori Rongey, Solutions Engineering Leader, Cisco

12:45 – 1:30 p.m. – Networking Lunch, sponsored by Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation (MCEDC) on behalf of Montgomery County, Maryland

Speaker: Bill Tompkins, President and CEO, Montgomery County Economic Development Corporation (MCEDC)

1:30 p.m. – Adjourn

*Registration closes on January 16, 2025.

*This registration is for in-person attendance only.

Register Now!

Internet-Exposed HMIs Pose Cybersecurity Risks to Water and Wastewater Systems

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a fact sheet providing mitigations and resources for the Water and Wastewater Systems (WWS) Sector using human machine interfaces (HMIs) to limit exposure on the internet and secure them against malicious cyber activity.
HMIs enable operational technology owners and operators to read supervisory control and data acquisition systems connected to programmable logic controllers. Threat actors have demonstrated the capability to easily find and exploit internet-exposed HMIs with cybersecurity weaknesses. CISA and EPA often identify internet-exposed HMIs through scanning via publicly available web-based search platforms. 
CISA and EPA encourage WWS organizations to review the fact sheet and implement the recommended mitigations and actions.

Click here for additional CISA Water and Wastewater Systems Sector cybersecurity information.

HiatusRAT Actors Targeting Web Cameras and DVRs

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is releasing this Private Industry Notification (PIN) to highlight HiatusRAT scanning campaigns against Chinese-branded web cameras and DVRs. Agencies and organizations are encouraged to implement the recommendations listed in the mitigation sector to reduce the likelihood and impact of these attack campaigns.
HiatusRAT is a Remote Access Trojan (RAT) whose latest iteration has likely been employed since July 2022. Malicious cyber actors commonly use RATs to take over and control a targeted device from a distance. The Hiatus campaign originally targeted outdated network edge devices. Cybersecurity companies have also observed these actors using the malware to target a range of Taiwan-based organizations and to carry out reconnaissance against a US government server used for submitting and retrieving defense contract proposals.
This FBI PIN contains threat information, mitigation recommendations, and is being provided to assist agencies and organizations in guarding against the persistent malicious actions of cybercriminals.

Microsoft.Source Newsletter | Issue 65


Season of AI Events Get started with Copilot. Microsoft AI is coming to a community event near you. Find a local event and sign up to learn new skills from experts.    
Featured
Take the Microsoft Learn Challenge | Ignite Edition > Each challenge is packed with in-depth training materials, live expert-led sessions, and interactive community events. You’ll have the opportunity to engage with industry professionals, get access to exclusive offers, deepen your technical knowledge, and gain practical skills that are in high demand.  

What’s New
blog icon Developer productivity resources > Learn new skills in events and challenges, automate repetitive tasks with GitHub Actions, find out what’s new in .NET 9, and discover how AI can help you write better code faster.  
blog icon The Book of AI > This comprehensive resource offers insights and practical guidance that can help you implement AI solutions effectively.  
video icon 20 Fan Favorite Extensions for VS Code > In this video, we’re showcasing 20 fan-favorite VS Code extensions that can boost your productivity, streamline your workflow, and supercharge your coding experience. (YouTube)    

Events See Local Events >
in person event icon Microsoft AI Tour / Multiple cities and dates > Join experts, industry leaders, and peers to explore the ways AI can drive growth and create lasting value at this free, one-day event.  
virtual event icon SQL on Fabric Live Learn Series / Multiples dates > SQL database is now available in public preview in Microsoft Fabric. Join live sessions with community experts and the Microsoft product team and see how to get started.  
Spotlight on GitHub Copilot Series / Live and on demand > Learn about GitHub Copilot and how prompting techniques can increase developer productivity across dozens of programming languages.  
on demand event icon Missed .NET Conf 2024? > The digital event is over, but you can catch up on all the fun and educational .NET sessions you missed, with our on-demand videos.   on demand event icon Microsoft Ignite / On demand > Missed a session? Explore the expansive Microsoft Ignite session catalog available on demand.  

Learning
certification icon Interested in Microsoft Fabric certification? > Apply by December 10 to receive a free DP-600 exam voucher, available to the first 5,000 eligible applicants.   GitHub repo icon Azure sample: Implement a VoiceRAG pattern > This repo contains an example of how to implement RAG support in applications that use voice as their user interface, powered by the GPT-4o realtime API for audio.  
Microsoft 365 Copilot for Developers learning collection > Discover how to integrate and optimize technologies across your organization through the power of Copilot.    

Multiple Vulnerabilities in Google Android OS Could Allow for Remote Code Execution – PATCH: NOW

OVERVIEW:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Google Android OS, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution. Android is an operating system developed by Google for mobile devices, including, but not limited to, smartphones, tablets, and watches. Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for remote code execution in the context of the logged on user. Depending on the privileges associated with the user an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer user rights on the system could be less impacted than those who operate with administrative user rights.

THREAT INTELLIGENCE:
There are currently no reports of these vulnerabilities being exploited in the wild. 

SYSTEMS AFFECTED:

  • Android OS patch levels prior to 2024-12-05 

RISK:

Government:

  • Large and medium government entities: High
  • Small government entities: Medium

Businesses:

  • Large and medium business entities: High
  • Small business entities: Medium

Home users: Low

TECHNICAL SUMMARY:
Multiple vulnerabilities have been discovered in Google Android OS, the most severe of which could allow for remote code execution in the context of the logged on user. Following the MITRE ATT&CK framework, exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities can be classified as follows:

Tactic: Execution (TA0002)

Technique: Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203):

  • A vulnerability in System that could allow for remote code execution. (CVE-2024-43767)
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Framework that could allow for elevation of privilege. (CVE-2024-43764, CVE-2024-43769)
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in System that could allow for elevation of privilege. (CVE-2024-43097, CVE-2024-43768)

Details of lower-severity vulnerabilities are as follows:

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Imagination Technologies. (CVE-2024-43077, CVE-2024-43701)
  • A vulnerability in MediaTek components. (CVE-2024-20125)
  • A vulnerability in Qualcomm components. (CVE-2024-33063)
  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Qualcomm closed-source components. (CVE-2024-33044, CVE-2024-33056, CVE-2024-43048, CVE-2024-43052)

Successful exploitation of the most severe of these vulnerabilities could allow for remote code execution. Depending on the privileges associated with the exploited component, an attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full rights. 

RECOMMENDATIONS:
We recommend the following actions be taken: 

  • Apply appropriate patches provided by Google to vulnerable systems, immediately after appropriate testing. (M1051: Update Software)
    • Safeguard 7.1: Establish and Maintain a Vulnerability Management Process: Establish and maintain a documented vulnerability management process for enterprise assets. Review and update documentation annually, or when significant enterprise changes occur that could impact this Safeguard.
    • Safeguard 7.4: Perform Automated Application Patch Management: Perform application updates on enterprise assets through automated patch management on a monthly, or more frequent, basis.
    • Safeguard 7.5: Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets: Perform automated vulnerability scans of internal enterprise assets on a quarterly, or more frequent, basis. Conduct both authenticated and unauthenticated scans, using a SCAP-compliant vulnerability scanning tool.
       
  • Remind users not to visit un-trusted websites or follow links provided by unknown or un-trusted sources. Inform and educate users regarding threats posed by hypertext links contained in emails or attachments, especially from un-trusted sources. (M1017: User Training)
     
  • Use capabilities to detect and block conditions that may lead to or be indicative of a software exploit occurring. (M1050: Exploit Protection)
    • Safeguard 10.5: Enable Anti-Exploitation Features: Enable anti-exploitation features on enterprise assets and software, where possible, such as Apple® System Integrity Protection (SIP) and Gatekeeper™.
    • Safeguard 13.10 : Perform Application Layer Filtering: Perform application layer filtering. Example implementations include a filtering proxy, application layer firewall, or gateway. 

REFERENCES:

Google:
https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/2024-12-01

CVE:
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-20125
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-33044
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-33056
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-33063
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43048
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43052
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43077
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43097
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43701
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43764
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43767
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43768
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-43769